Search for: "Jill Abramson" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by azatty
Jill Abramson It took 160 years, but if finally happened. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:48 am
Is it just me, or has the NYT become boring since the departure of Jill Abramson? [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:48 am
I reported in January that four of the then-nine jobs were held by women.By the time Abramson was fired last week, that number had increased to five, and Abramson had been trying to hire another woman, Janine Gibson, as co-managing editor for digital. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:36 am
In this race-and-gender game, it's not the NYT or Jill Abramson who is out there playing the cards. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 10:38 am
During the dicsussion Jill Abramson noted that most of the time when a driver kills a pedestrian, nothing happens, not even a ticket. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:57 pm by California Employment Law Letter
Still, it took the paper 160 years to hire Jill Abramson as its first female executive editor in 2011. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 5:27 am
"The Forgotten Testimonies Against Clarence Thomas": Jill Abramson has this post at the "Daily Intelligencer" blog of New York magazine. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:06 pm
Jill Abramson was named to the top editorial job at the New York Times Thursday, the first woman to hold the post. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:43 am by Media Law Prof
Two female editors-in-chief are out suddenly at prestigious papers, Jill Abramson at The New York Times, and Natalie Nougayrede at Le Monde. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:16 am
And I feel irked to accept Jill Abramson as the face of the topic of The Problem of Female Leadership. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:08 am by Howard Bashman
“This Justice Is Taking Over the Supreme Court, and He Won’t Be Alone”: Jill Abramson has this guest essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:20 pm
"Sources close to the paper’s upper masthead confirmed to Gawker that executive editor Jill Abramson had voiced dissatisfaction with Lindgren’s direction of the magazine over the past several months." [read post]